|
|
@@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ But that doesn't mean it's not useful for other purposes. In the future, more co
|
|
|
|
|
|
`rathole` doesn't interference with the application layer traffic. A right place for this kind of stuff is the web server, and a network capture tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- *`frp`'s STCP*
|
|
|
+- *`frp`'s STCP or other setup that requires visitors' side configuration*
|
|
|
|
|
|
- You may want to consider secure tunnels like wireguard or zerotier.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- *P2P hole punching*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- P2P hole punching requires setup on the visitors' side. If that kind of setup is possible, then there are a lot more tools available. `rathole` primarily focuses on NAT traversal by forwarding, which doesn't require any setup for visitors.
|
|
|
+ If that kind of setup is possible, then there are a lot more tools available. You may want to consider secure tunnels like wireguard or zerotier. `rathole` primarily focuses on NAT traversal by forwarding, which doesn't require any setup for visitors.
|